Image indisponible
couleur :
-
-
-
- Pour voir cette vidéo, téléchargez Flash Player
Sigma Objectif 120-300 mm F2,8 DG OS HSM pour Canon
Marque | Sigma |
Description de la longueur focale | 300 millimeters |
Type de lentille | Téléobjectif |
Fixations compatibles | Sigma SA |
Description de l'objectif | 300 mm |
Distance focale maximale | 300 Millimètres |
Distance focale minimale | 120 Millimètres |
Design de l'objectif | Zoom |
Type de mise au point | Automatique/manuelle |
Longueur focale fixe de l'objectif | 300 Millimètres |
À propos de cet article
- <b>Description du produit</b>: Sigma 120-300mm F2.8 DG OS HSM. composant pour</b>: SLR
- <b>Structure de l'objectif (éléments/groupes)</b>: 23/18
- <b>Type d'objectif</b>: Zoom télé. compatibilité entre marques de caméras</b>: Canon
- <b>Zoom maximal (PS)</b>: 8.1x
- <b>Couleur</b>: Noir
- <b>Diamètre</b>: 12.14 cm
- <b>Taille de filtre</b>: 10.5 cm
- <b>Longueur du produit</b>: 29.1 cm
Top Brand
Sigma

95% de notes positives de la part de 200+ clients

1K+ commandes récentes de cette marque
Les clients ont également consulté ces articles
Ressources sur la sécurité et les produits
Images et contacts
Ressources sur la sécurité et les produits
Problème lors du chargement des informations
Images et contacts
Informations sur le produit
Descriptif technique
Marque | Sigma |
---|---|
Couleur | Noir |
Type de produit | SLR |
Zoom optique | 8,1 Multiplicateur x |
Stabilisation d'image | oui |
Caractéristiques spéciales | stabilisateur d'images |
Type d'installation | Canon |
Distance focale | 30 centimètres - 12 centimètres |
Ouverture du diaphragme | 2,8 Modificateur inconnu |
Modèle | 137101 |
Garantie constructeur | Garantie Fabricant: 1 an(s) |
Dimensions du colis (L x l x h) | 42 x 25 x 24 centimètres |
Poids du colis | 5,32 Kilogrammes |
Dimensions du colis (L x l x h) | 29.1 x 12.4 x 12.4 centimètres |
Poids de l'article | 2950 Grammes |
Camera Lens | 300 mm |
Couleur du modèle | Noir |
Pays d'origine | Japon |
A la stabilisation d'image | Oui |
Pièces incluses | Sigma objectif, sac, pare-soleil |
Lens Fixed Focal Length | 300 Millimètres |
Max Focal Length | 300 Millimètres |
Min Focal Length | 120 Millimètres |
Année du modèle | 2013 |
Référence | 137101 |
Lens Design | Zoom |
Maximum Aperture Range | F 2.8 |
Type de focus | Automatique/manuelle |
Style | Monture Canon |
Photo Filter Thread Size | 105 Millimètres |
Disponibilité des pièces détachées | Information indisponible sur les pièces détachées |
Mises à jour logicielles garanties jusqu’à | Information non disponible |
Informations complémentaires
Dimensions du produit (L x l x h) | 29,11 x 12,4 x 12,4 cm; 2,95 kilogrammes |
---|---|
Moyenne des commentaires client |
4,1 sur 5 étoiles |
Numéro du modèle de l'article | 137101 |
ASIN | B00AXZYUUI |
Date de mise en ligne sur Amazon.fr | 9 janvier 2013 |
Politique de retour
Votre avis

Sigma Objectif 120-300 mm F2,8 DG OS HSM pour Canon
Lien permanent:
Avez-vous trouvé un prix plus bas ? Dites-le-nous. Nous ne pouvons pas égaler chaque prix indiqué, mais nous allons utiliser vos idées pour garantir la compétitivité de nos prix.
Où avez-vous vu un prix plus bas ?
Fields with an asterisk * are required
Contenu du carton
Commentaires client
- 5 étoiles4 étoiles3 étoiles2 étoiles1 étoile5 étoiles62%11%11%7%9%62%
- 5 étoiles4 étoiles3 étoiles2 étoiles1 étoile4 étoiles62%11%11%7%9%11%
- 5 étoiles4 étoiles3 étoiles2 étoiles1 étoile3 étoiles62%11%11%7%9%11%
- 5 étoiles4 étoiles3 étoiles2 étoiles1 étoile2 étoiles62%11%11%7%9%7%
- 5 étoiles4 étoiles3 étoiles2 étoiles1 étoile1 étoile62%11%11%7%9%9%
Les avis clients, y compris le nombre d’étoiles du produit, aident les clients à en savoir plus sur le produit et à décider s'il leur convient.
Pour calculer le nombre global d’étoiles et la ventilation en pourcentage par étoile, nous n'utilisons pas une simple moyenne. Au lieu de cela, notre système prend en compte des éléments tels que la date récente d'un commentaire et si l'auteur de l'avis a acheté l'article sur Amazon. Les avis sont également analysés pour vérifier leur fiabilité.
En savoir plus sur le fonctionnement des avis clients sur AmazonMeilleures évaluations de France
Un problème est survenu lors du filtrage des avis. Rafraîchissez la page.
- Avis laissé en France le 24 mars 2015Style: Monture NikonExcellent objectif, je l'utilise pour l'animalier, répond directement , autofocus non bruyant en comparaison avec Nikon, seulement il est très lourd , il faut au minimum un monopode, c'est du matériel pro.
- Avis laissé en France le 7 août 2014Style: Monture CanonAchat vérifiéGrande ouverture et stabilisateur optique efficace permettent des photos d'un piqué remarquable.
Dommage qu'il soit si lourd (la rançon de la précision des mécanismes associés à ces lentilles de grande dimension)
Meilleurs commentaires provenant d’autres pays
-
Kindle CustomerAvis laissé au Royaume-Uni le 10 mai 2018
3,0 sur 5 étoiles Pretty good but not perfect
Style: Monture CanonAchat vérifiéGreat in low light conditions but the AF is not as good as my (much cheaper) Sigma 150-600mm C. The AF is also much more noisy compared to my Sigma 150-600mm C. Not bad for 120-300mm f2.8 but unless you really need f2.8 I would recommend something else.
-
DeAvis laissé aux États-Unis le 11 janvier 2015
5,0 sur 5 étoiles The Sigma 137101 120-300mm f/2.8 DG OS HSM Lens is an Amazing compliment to our existing Canon telephoto L class lenses
Style: Monture CanonAchat vérifiéBefore sharing my thoughts on the Sigma 120-300mm F2.8 DG OS HSM Lens for Canon, please let me share a little about my photography background and existing equipment... I first got into photography in 1968 when I was with Army Aviation in Vietnam. At that time I was using a minolta 35mm camera... I first started using Canon equipment When the first Rebel came out and then upgraded to the 20D when it first came out and now my wife and I use Canon's 1DX, 5D-III, 7D-II and 7D. We have several of Canon's L series long lenses including the 70-200 f/2.8 IS II USM, the 100-400 f/4.5/5.6 IS II USM, 400mm f/4 DO and the 600mm f/4L IS II USM. We have very nice full sensor and crop sensor cameras with very nice glass but we clearly had a gap in the 300mm range.
Canon's 300mm f/2.8l IS II USM goes for $6,599 and only fills part of the gap. Besides needing the 300mm f/2.8 for stills and videos of wildlife we often need to be able to have zoom available but still need to be able to retain the f/2.8. Canon does have a 200-400 but it is f/4 and costs $11,799. Canon also has a 28-300 and a 70-300 at $2,549 and $1,499 respectively but they are f/3.5-5.6L and f/4-5.5.6L $3,599 respectively... So this is how we came to look at Sigma's 120-300mm f/2.8 DG OS HSM lens for Canon.
If you are not familiar with Sigma's lettering system, as I was not, The DG is Sigma's designation for Full Frame Lenses although this lens also works well with APS-C sized sensors. With the Canon 7D-II 1.6 crop factor this gives us a zoom ratio of 192-480mm. The OS stands for Optical Stabilizer which you would only turn on when not using a tripod. This is a rather heavy lens and hand holding when combined with the weight of your camera makes it very difficult when filming moving targets... I know I have tried, but any good glass lens above 200mm that I am using, is always on a tripod or at least a monopod. The HSM stands for Hyper Sonic Motor.
Since I am basically a Canon snob when coming to DSLR cameras or associated lenses, I was very very hesitant in trying this particular Sigma lens, even at the great price of $3,599 when compared to Canon's 300mm f/2.8 at $6,599. However Amazon has never given us any problems with returns as long as the equipment we tried was treated with care and I always treat all of my Camera equipment with great care. So that helped with my incentive to go ahead and try the Sigma lens but not until I read every review I could find...
If you go through Amazon's reviews on this particular lens, the lowest review I could find was a 3 star from September 2013 and it's complaint was connection problems resulting in focus issues however I have not experienced either issue with the Lens that I purchased so I can't speak to that one... There were two 4 star reviews, one from September 2013 from a sports shooter... His main complaint dealt with initial focus issues which he was able to correct with the optional Sigma USB Dock for Canon. I could not find any of the Sigma USB Docks for Canon in stock anywhere in the US and had to order one from Japan which still has not arrived, therefore I can not speak to this yet until I receive the Dock next week.
I will provide an update after I have been able test the settings after using the Dock, but so far I have not had any focus issues, on the contrary I have been very impressed with the focus that I have been able to receive from this lens so far and I am very picky about the sharpness of my photos... We have shot wildlife and landscape in East Africa, (Kenya), as well as South Africa, (Botswana), all over the US and Canada and several locations in the UK, Europe, Australia, New Zealand and the South Pacific Islands. Our travel is expensive and returning with out of focus shots are not an option.
The other Amazon 4 Star review was more recent, October 2014 from a Nikon shooter who was also a sports shooter. He also purchased the USB dock primarily to be able to see all of the lens' features, especially those dealing with the differences in the focus speed. However for him the lens was spot on focus out of the box. His main complaint was regarding focus speed and function. he was shooting primarily AFC spot focus and the lens did not meet his expectations... Then he switched to D9 focus and it worked very well for him. He did also mention the weight... The other 16 Amazon reviews were all 5 star and all praised the lens... Some did reference the weight but none felt the need to ding the review any stars... Again, so far, I have not experienced any focus issues and because sharpness is critical to me, I am always using a tripod with a wimberley head for my heavy glass so the weight is just not a factor to me... Amazon lists the weight at 6.5 lbs. but mine is closer to 7.5 lbs. maybe their reference does not include the collar/tripod mount, hood or caps, not really sure.
B&H Photo had 15 reviews on this particular lens. One of those was a brief 1 Star review from June 2013 complaining of severe back focusing problems even after using the USB dock. They had one brief 3 Star review. He was also using it with a Canon 7D-II & 5D-III and complained it wasn't as sharp for him with either camera even after using the USB dock and updating the firmware. He was comparing to Canon's 300 f/4 and 300 f/28. I have not tried it with our 5D-III yet because I love the crop factor of our Canon 7D-II but I am certain that my wife will be trying it with both the 1DX and the 5D-III. Again, I will provide an update to the review after testing our other cameras but so far I am just not able to reproduce the focus issues that these gentlemen reported.
Of the remaining 13 B&H reviews, 6 of them were 4 Star reviews... Their main complaints dealt with the weight(3), tripod collar smoothness(1), claim of 280mm vs 300mm(1), best sharpness at one stop down from wide open(1), not as fast focusing as Canon's 300mm f/2.8(2), the need to purchase the USB dock to fine tune the lens(2). So for me, again, the weight is not a factor and not worth a star ding because I feel one should be using a tripod or at least a monopod when using any f/2.8 300mm+ L lens... I have not been able to reproduce the tripod collar smoothness issue, on the contrary my tests proved the collar to be very smooth... I actually feel that being able to purchase a USB collar to fine tune the lens is a huge bonus. I want to be able to fine tune my lens using the 2 custom buttons to match my specific needs and I am not aware of being able to do anything like this with any of our Canon L lenses... I am not smart enough to know how to test whether or not I am getting the full 300mm vs. 280mm other than metadata and my metadata reports the full 300mm, so I can't really speak to that complaint... So far I have not been able to reproduce any of the reported focus issues or focus speed issues reported and I have shot several different fast moving wildlife events and long distance scenery shots with no issues to report in those areas.
So to wrap it up, from my perspective and my limited experience with this lens, Sigma's 137101 120-300mm f/2.8 DG OS HSM Lens for Canon is amazing, especially for the price being $3,000 less than Canon's f/2.8 300mm, plus having the flexibility of being able to shoot with the range of 120mm to 300m vs Canon's 300mm prime, or in the case of our 7D-II, 192mm - 480mm. I would not hesitate to recommend this lens to anyone...
-
Blende_11Avis laissé en Allemagne le 31 mars 2014
5,0 sur 5 étoiles Ausgezeichnet
Style: Monture NikonAchat vérifiéIch fotografiere viele Bundesliga-Handballspiele. Dieses SIGMA-Objektiv bietet den Vorteil der variablen Brennweite UND der konstanten Lichtstärke. Die Schärfe ist extrem schnell da (an einer NIKON D4 getestet) - ich kann nicht klagen. Auch in anderen Einsatzbereichen wie Tischtennis und Fußball bin ich voll zufrieden.
Eines ist dabei wichtig zu wissen: man sollte sich auch das USB-Dock zulegen, denn mithilfe des Dock's können die Custom-Schalter programmiert werden. So habe ich auf Custom 1 den schnellen AF-Fokus gelegt und auf Custom 2 den langsameren, der dafür aber leise ist (für Portraits oder Reportagen geeignet).
FAZIT: WIRKLICH Empfehlenswert!
-
dmbTankAvis laissé aux États-Unis le 8 décembre 2013
5,0 sur 5 étoiles Top Quality
Style: Monture NikonAchat vérifiéThis all started a year ago when I found myself faced with a perfect photo opportunity and only armed with a 60mm that day. I ran across two black bears busy digging out a tree stump across a creek and they were so engrossed neither noticed the group of photographers shooting away from the other side, except me!!. As I looked around, I saw almost every photographer with a long lens, 300, 400 both Canons and Nikons shooters, one was using a Nikon 200-400.
Here I was with a great photo opt and I came home nothing to show for it, because I was not prepared.
I have posted some of photos I took with this lens on the truetoad site, look for the gallery-wildlife-birds
There are a LOT of choices in the 300mm and longer range out there and one could list half a page of various zooms that reach as far as 500mm for under $1500.00, but each of these offerings has its draw backs in performance. For one, I don’t like lens that extend and contract during zooming (pumpers as I call them), I prefer internal focusing with a constant f stop, at lest f4 and nothing more.
As I laid out my requirements with my budget restraints the choices narrowed considerably so, I made my choice based on my available funds going for the most performance at a reasonable cost. After several days of reading and research, It was the new Sigma 120~300mm 2.8 Sport edition I decided on. Had I the capital (cash) I would have went for the Nikon 500mm f4, I plan on getting that lens next year. The full hands on review for this Sigma can be found on my TrueToad site.
Here it is in a nut shell;
Weight: This is a seven pounder, and couple that with your DSLR and your closing in on 9 pounds. So, unless you have been working out this may be around the weight that benefits from some kind of support. I am researching a harness to allow me to carry and shoot - we shall see
Quality/Craftsmanship: Sigma did a wonderful job revamping this lens, the build, fit and finish is top notch and has weather sealing. This is a top quality lens, no slop, wobble, or otherwise.
Image Quality: Very good, I am impressed and having the infamous Nikkor 70-200mm VRII Sigma's image sharpness is in most cases just as sharp as the Nikon's. There is some slight softness at 300mm but nothing to complain about.
Focus and Optical Stabilization: The focus is fast, and accurate, with a fast or slow option. Mine does have some difficulty at times when clutter is near the subject, such as birds in trees surrounded by branches, but overall, the focus nails it, and keep in mind a lot depends on available light, and how you have YOUR camera set up. Optical Stabilization works as well as my Nikkor VRII lens, and does improve overall image quality when using slower shutter speeds. This lens has OS two modes, and when engaged makes a slight auditable click, and when viewing through the viewfinder you can see the image lock. So, yes it works and is beneficial.
Price VS Performance; This is not a cheap lens, so you expect a good performing lens when you get it. SIGMA has done a great job of adding tweaks to their already great lens making it even better and more enjoyable to use.
Since the next closest price for a 2.8 300mm will set you back about 2 grand more, this lens makes a lot of sense.
Things you need to know and consider: Consider adding the USB dock if you buy this lens, the dock allows you to update the firmware, and make additional tweaks to a few parameters.
This lens DOES NOT support Nikon Tele converters. So if you a Nikon Shooter and already have an investment in Nikon TCs, your out of luck. You will need to purchase one that works, I suggest in this case the SIGMA line as they work perfectly with this lens. Yep - another $250.00 sorry. I use both the 1.4 and 2.0 Sigma TCs and I can say the 1.4 really shines, making this lens a 420mm and very good sharpness; check out my images on the TrueToad site shot with this combination.
I gave this lens 5 stars based on the quality, performance, and price when measured against the cost of other 300mm 2.8 lenses.
Sure, the primes offered by Nikon or Canon do deliver slight increase in performance, but the additional cost in my opinion out weighs the benefit.
-
PuAvis laissé en Allemagne le 18 décembre 2015
5,0 sur 5 étoiles Eine Super Optik ! Zu unschlagbaren Preis ! Es gibt nichts vergleichbares auf dem Markt !
Style: Monture CanonAchat vérifiéEine Super Optik !
Ich bin echt beeindruckt !
Es gibt nichts vergleichbares auf dem Markt !
Selbst mit dem 1,4x Telekonverter ist das ding eine MACHT !
ich hatte erst meine Zweifel aber seit Sigma die ART und SPORT Serie hat ist Sigma TOP !